Finance releases draft income tax technical amendments
On 9 August 2022, the Department of Finance released for public comment draft legislative proposals (and accompanying explanatory notes) relating to long-awaited technical amendments to the Income Tax Act (the Act) and Income Tax Regulations. Many of the technical amendments included in this release respond to issues raised by taxpayers and their representatives, or are part of an ongoing effort by the Department of Finance to improve the certainty and integrity of the tax system.
These amendments include various minor technical amendments, as well as a number of more significant technical amendments and new rules. In total, there are more than 130 new or amended provisions included in this technical amendments package. The following is a summary of some of the more significant proposed amendments.
Interested parties are invited to submit comments on the legislative proposals by 30 September 2022.
Business income tax measures
- Corporate tax-attribute trading – Amendments to clarify that the definitions of “attribute trading restriction” and “specified provision” in subsection 256.1(1) also refer to a section 251.2 loss restriction event. In addition, the anti-avoidance rule in subsection 256.1(6) is amended to clarify that the provision applies (to deem the tax attribute restrictions to apply as if an acquisition of control occurred) when one of the main reasons of any transaction or event or any transaction or event in the series of transactions or events is so that a specified provision does not apply to one or more corporations. These amendments are deemed to be effective as of 9 August 2022.
- Shareholder debtexception – Amendment to provide that money lending businesses whose outstanding loans to arm’s length borrowers are less than 90% of their total outstanding loans (e.g., captive money lenders within a corporate group) are no longer eligible for the ordinary money lending business exception to the rules requiring shareholder debt to be included in income. Related interpretive rules for applying the arm’s length test are also provided to address situations where the borrower or the lender, or both, is a partnership (including multi-tiered partnership situations). These amendments apply to loans made after 2022, as well as to any portion of a loan made before 2023 that remains outstanding on 1 January 2023, as if that portion were a separate loan made on 1 January 2023.
- Partnerships ceasing to exist – Amendments to the tax-deferred rollover rules in subsections 98(3) and 98(5) for the distribution of property to members of a Canadian partnership that ceases to exist. In general terms, the amendments impose a new limit on the maximum bump-up that a member may designate in respect of property received from the dissolving partnership that is a membership interest in another partnership, by ensuring that the bump-up does not include unrealized gains and recapture income in respect of property that would be ineligible for a bump-up if the property were held directly by the partnership (e.g., depreciable property). These amendments respond to transactions involving tiered partnership structures that were being undertaken by some taxpayers to obtain a bump-up in the cost of an undivided interest in a capital property (e.g., the taxpayer’s undivided interest in a partnership in which the dissolving partnership has a direct interest) by an amount in respect of property that would be ineligible for a bump-up if the property had been held directly by the dissolving partnership. These amendments are effective in respect of partnerships that cease to exist on or after 9 August 2022.
- Eligible capital property – payments received after 2016 – Introduction of a new transitional rule to address situations where eligible capital property was disposed of prior to the announcement of the repeal of the eligible capital property regime (i.e., before 22 March 2016) and a portion of the proceeds of disposition did not become receivable by the seller until after 2016, but before 2024, under a condition of the supporting agreement which, at the end of 2016, the parties to the agreement were unsure would be met. If certain conditions are met, this new rule allows taxpayers to elect to treat the amount that would be a taxable capital gain (as a result of the new rules that came into effect on 1 January 2017) as business income from the disposition of eligible capital property and not as a taxable capital gain (except for capital dividend account purposes). In effect, this election provides the taxpayer with generally the same treatment it would have received if such payments had been received prior to 2017. This new rule responds to a 29 July 2019 comfort letter issued by the Department of Finance and is deemed to be effective retroactively on 1 January 2017.
- Deduction for mining taxes – Amendments to allow for the deduction, under paragraph 20(1)(v), of eligible provincial or territorial mining taxes that were paid by a taxpayer in a taxation year in respect of a taxpayer’s income from mining operations (or non-Crown royalty income included in the taxpayer’s income) in a previous taxation year, where that previous year is statute-barred and a valid waiver in respect of the normal reassessment period for the previous taxation year had not been filed by the taxpayer. A further amendment also allows for a deduction of interest paid in the year to a province or territory on any deductible eligible mining taxes on income from mining operations or on non-Crown royalty income. The amendments respond to a 3 September 2019 comfort letter issued by the Department of Finance and are effective for taxation years ending after 2007. An assessment for any taxation year ending before 9 August 2022 that would otherwise be precluded because of the year being statute-barred or because no relevant waiver has been filed in respect of it will only be made to take into account the above-mentioned amendments if the taxpayer elects in writing on or before the day that is six months after the implementing legislation receives Royal Assent.
- Reclassification of Canadian development expenses for preceding years – Amendments to ensure that certain oil or gas discovery well expenses incurred after 2018 (including expenses incurred in 2019 that were deemed to have been incurred in 2018 because of the “look-back” rule) can no longer be reclassified as Canadian exploration expenses (CEE), and expenses that were incurred before 2021 continue to be eligible to be reclassified as CEE if the expenses relate to a discovery well that was the subject of a written commitment to incur those expenses that was entered into by the taxpayer before 22 March 2017 (including a commitment to a government under the terms of a license or permit).
- Definition of “term preferred share” – Amendments to the definition of “term preferred share” in subsection 248(1) to include references to paragraph 258(3)(a) with the intent to allow the specific anti-avoidance rules contained in paragraphs (i.1) and (j) of the definition to apply equally to shares that were issued to avoid (or limit) the application of the dividend denial rule under paragraph 258(3)(a) for dividends received by a specified financial institution resident in Canada from foreign affiliates. This amendment applies to amounts received on or after 9 August 2022.
International income tax measures
- Foreign affiliates – Various amendments to the foreign affiliate rules, including:
- Foreign affiliate share-for-share exchange exception – Amendments that expand the scope of the subsection 85.1(4) anti-avoidance rule, which provides exceptions to the foreign affiliate rollover rules on a transfer of shares of a foreign affiliate to another foreign affiliate, and that are meant to address a range of unintended tax deferral circumstances. In this regard, the amendments include the expansion of the relevant subsequent acquirers to include non-arm’s length nonresidents and partnerships with arm’s length members or non-arm’s length nonresident members; the narrowing of the carve-out for foreign affiliate subsequent acquirers such that only foreign affiliates that are controlled foreign affiliates for the purposes of section 17 are excepted from the anti-avoidance rule; the express capture of subsequent dispositions of one or more properties substituted for the shares of the first affiliate, or that derive any of their fair market value from the first affiliate shares or any substituted property; and the introduction of a new provision to ensure that a rollover is not available if the property that is disposed of is excluded property of a foreign affiliate of the taxpayer at the time of the subsequent disposition. Other amendments also provide interpretative rules essentially for applying the arm’s length test where the taxpayer or the acquirer, or both, is a partnership. These amendments apply to dispositions that occur on or after 9 August 2022.
- Foreign merger anti-avoidance – Amendments to expand the scope of the foreign merger anti-avoidance rule in subsection 87(8.3), which is intended to prevent the use of certain corporate structures to circumvent the anti-avoidance rule relating to foreign affiliate rollovers on transfers of shares of a foreign affiliate to another foreign affiliate in subsection 85.1(4). These amendments, which parallel the amendments made to the foreign affiliate share-for-share exchange exception above, further restrict the parties to which a disposition of shares of the new foreign corporation may be made without triggering subsection 87(8.3) and expand the categories of property the disposal of which may trigger the application of the provision. Similar to the amendments made to the foreign affiliate share-for-share exchange exception above, other amendments also provide interpretative rules for applying the arm’s length test in certain situations involving partnerships. These amendments apply to dispositions that occur on or after 9 August 2022.
- Foreign affiliate suppression election – Amendment to limit the application of subsection 88(3.3), which allows a taxpayer to elect to reduce the amount for which a distributed property is considered disposed of under paragraph 88(3)(a) by a disposing foreign affiliate on a qualifying liquidation and dissolution of the disposing foreign affiliate, to distributed property of the disposing foreign affiliate that is shares of another foreign affiliate. This amendment is intended to align the rule more clearly with its original policy intent by ensuring that any gain that could otherwise be realized on the disposition of the disposing foreign affiliate’s shares cannot be eliminated or deferred when a deferral would be inappropriate. This amendment applies to dispositions that occur on or after 9 August 2022.
- Definition of eligible controlled foreign affiliate – Amendments to the definition of “eligible controlled foreign affiliate”, which is relevant to the “relevant cost base” definition used in the context of foreign affiliate reorganizations, to remove the circularity that would otherwise arise in situations where the participating percentage (used in the “eligible controlled foreign affiliate” definition) of shares owned by a taxpayer in respect of a foreign affiliate could depend on whether a valid “relevant cost base” election has been made (the ability to elect a higher cost base of a foreign affiliate property is based on whether the foreign affiliate is an eligible controlled foreign affiliate). The amendments also ensure that paragraph (b) of the definition “eligible controlled foreign affiliate” can be satisfied even if the controlled foreign affiliate’s foreign accrual property income (FAPI) for the year is not more than $5,000. While these amendments apply to determinations made after 19 August 2011, a taxpayer may elect, in respect of all of its foreign affiliates, an alternate “read-as” version of paragraph (b) of the definition for determinations made before 9 August 2022.
- Upstream loans from foreign affiliates – Amendments to the exception to the upstream loan rules for loans made in the ordinary course of an ordinary money lending business to exclude a business if, at any time during which an upstream loan is outstanding, less than 90% of the total outstanding amount of the loans of the business is owing by borrowers that deal at arm’s length with the business (e.g., captive money lenders within a corporate group). Related interpretative rules for applying the arm’s length test are also provided to address situations where the borrower or the creditor, or both, is a partnership. These amendments, which parallel the amendments made to the shareholder debt exception described above, apply to loans made after 2022, as well as to any portion of a loan made before 2023 that remains outstanding on 1 January 2023, as if that portion were a separate loan made on 1 January 2023.
- Base erosion rule for provision of services – Amendments to the base erosion rule in subparagraph 95(2)(b)(i), including the introduction of a new exception (provided for in new subsection 95(3.03)). The base erosion rule in subparagraph 95(2)(b)(i) deems the provision of services (or an undertaking to provide services) by a payee foreign affiliate of a taxpayer to be a separate business of the foreign affiliate other than an active business and deems income from that business (or that pertains or is incident to it) to be income from a business other than an active business and thus FAPI, provided certain conditions in clauses 95(2)(b)(i)(A) or (B) are met. The amendments ensure that, where the conditions in clause 95(2)(b)(i)(B) are met (i.e., the amount paid or payable for the services (or the undertaking) is deductible (or can reasonably be considered to relate to a deductible amount) in computing the FAPI of another foreign affiliate (the payer foreign affiliate) for a taxation year), the services income is included in the payee affiliate’s FAPI only in proportion to the aggregate interests, of taxpayers of which the payer foreign affiliate is a foreign affiliate, in the payer foreign affiliate’s income. These amendments, which respond to a 12 June 2017 comfort letter issued by the Department of Finance, apply in respect of taxation years of a foreign affiliate of a taxpayer that begin after 2015.
- Functional currency tax reporting – Various amendments to the functional currency tax reporting rules, including:
- Qualifying currency – Amendment to include the Japanese yen as a qualifying currency. This amendment is in response to a 29 July 2019 comfort letter issued by the Department of Finance and is effective for taxation years that begin after 2019.
- Functional currency anti-avoidance rule – Amendment to expand the anti-avoidance rule in subsection 261(18) to include situations where the transferee reports in a functional currency at the time of the property transfer and the transferor has a different tax reporting currency (such as a situation involving the amalgamation of two Canadian dollar tax reporters to form a new corporation that is a functional currency tax reporter, with the purpose of retroactively restating some tax results in the elected functional currency). This amendment applies to transfers of property that occur on or after 9 August 2022.
- Functional currency stop-loss rule – Amendment to the conditions in subsection 261(20) for the application of the stop-loss rule in subsection 261(21) to ensure that corporations that enter into specified transactions with a related individual will also be subject to the stop-loss rule. This amendment applies to “accrual periods” (as defined in subsection 261(20)) that begin on or after 9 August 2022. The intention, as stated by the Department of Finance, is for the amended rule to apply only to loans and other transactions that are entered into on or after 9 August 2022.
- Foreign property reporting definitions – Amendments to the definitions of “specified Canadian entity” and “specified foreign property” for purposes of the foreign property reporting requirements under section 233.3 — in general terms, specified Canadian entities must file an information return with respect to their specified foreign property if the total cost amount of such property exceeds $100,000. The definition of specified Canadian entity is amended to expand the exception for partnerships such that a partnership will be a specified Canadian entity only if less than 90% of the partnership’s income is allocable to members that are nonresident persons or are listed in any of subparagraphs (a)(i) to (viii) of that definition (i.e., generally tax-exempt or flow-through entities). The definition of specified foreign property is amended to exclude certain superannuation and pension plans that are resident in Australia or New Zealand for income tax purposes (and are subject to a reduced rate of income tax in the respective country) so that such plans are on the same footing as most other foreign pension plans for the purposes of the foreign property reporting requirements under section 233.3. These amendments apply to taxation years and fiscal periods that end after 9 August 2022.
Personal income tax measures and measures relating to trusts